Guilford County
File #: 2019-291    Version: 1 Name:
Type: New Business Status: Passed
File created: 6/5/2019 In control: Board of Commissioners
On agenda: 6/20/2019 Final action: 6/20/2019
Title: BB&T THIRD FLOOR SHELL SPACE RENOVATION
Attachments: 1. Event 652 - BBT third floor upfit - Affidavit C&D, 2. Event 652 - BBT third floor upfit - Certified Bid Tab, 3. Event 652 - BBT third floor upfit - Letter of Recommendation 06_04_2019
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
TITLE
Title
BB&T THIRD FLOOR SHELL SPACE RENOVATION
end

SPONSOR
Sponsor
Dan Durham (Tari Maynor-Brady)
end

BACKGROUND
Background
Design for the renovation of the existing shell space on the third floor of the BB&T building began in March of 2019. The program for this space includes a 2,376 sf office suite for the Budget Office including eight offices, three small conference rooms and open collaboration space. Also included is a new Fitness Center with a 1,583 sf equipment room, 486 sf group exercise room and an office for a future wellness staff employee. The remainder of the shell space will remain unfinished for future fit-out. The architect on the project is J. Hyatt Hammond and was selected based on having an on-call contract in place and their successful record of other renovation projects with Guilford County.
The project was released for bids on May 9, 2019. The bid opening was scheduled for May 30, 2019 and five bids were received and opened during a public bid opening. The bids are listed below:
Name Base Bid
A. Vogt Construction $316,000
CT Wilson $397,394
Duke Construction $369,876
HICAPS Construction $294,000
OU Chavis $347,473
Of the five (5) bids received, HICAPS Construction was the apparent low bidder with a base bid of $294,000. It was determined that the proposal from HICAPS Construction was missing documents that were required to be submitted with the bid including the Contractor’s Qualification Statement, Consent to Surety, E-Verify Affidavit and Non-Collusion Affidavit. HICAPS’ proposal was therefore determined to be non-responsive by Purchasing.
The next lowest responsive, responsible bidder is A. Vogt Con...

Click here for full text